Monnet v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Monnet v. Freeman

1991 OK 90, 821 P.2d 1061, 1991 Okla. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 287293

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 19, 1991

DocketNo. 78274

StatusPublished

This text of 1991 OK 90 (Monnet v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monnet v. Freeman, 1991 OK 90, 821 P.2d 1061, 1991 Okla. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 287293 (Okla. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER DENYING RELIEF

The court treats the paperwork on file both as an application to invoke its original jurisdiction under Art. 7, § 4, Okl. Const., and as the petitioner’s quest for this court’s administrative review — in the exercise of powers conferred upon it by Art. 7, § 6, Okl. Const. — of petitioner’s assignment by the respondent to the probate division of the District Court, Oklahoma County.

On consideration of the paperwork laid before it, the court denies the relief sought. Art. 7, § 10(b), Okl. Const.; 20 O.S.1981 § 23, subdiv. (2); Rule 2, Rules on Administration of Courts, 20 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1, App. 2; Graham v. Cannon, Okl., 574 P.2d 305, 309 [1978],

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, Y.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE and ALMA WILSON, JJ., concur. KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur in result. LAVENDER and DOOLIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING RELIEF

The court treats the paperwork on file both as an application to invoke its original jurisdiction under Art. 7, § 4, Okl. Const., and as the petitioner’s quest for this court’s administrative review — in the exercise of powers conferred upon it by Art. 7, § 6, Okl. Const. — of petitioner’s assignment by the respondent to the probate division of the District Court, Oklahoma County.

On consideration of the paperwork laid before it, the court denies the relief sought. Art. 7, § 10(b), Okl. Const.; 20 O.S.1981 § 23, subdiv. (2); Rule 2, Rules on Administration of Courts, 20 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1, App. 2; Graham v. Cannon, Okl., 574 P.2d 305, 309 [1978],

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, Y.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE and ALMA WILSON, JJ., concur. KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur in result. LAVENDER and DOOLIN, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1991 OK 90, 821 P.2d 1061, 1991 Okla. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 287293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monnet-v-freeman-okla-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack