Monnet v. Freeman

1991 OK 90, 821 P.2d 1061, 1991 Okla. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 287293
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 19, 1991·No. No. 78274·Published

Opinions

ORDER DENYING RELIEF

The court treats the paperwork on file both as an application to invoke its original jurisdiction under Art. 7, § 4, Okl. Const., and as the petitioner’s quest for this court’s administrative review — in the exercise of powers conferred upon it by Art. 7, § 6, Okl. Const. — of petitioner’s assignment by the respondent to the probate division of the District Court, Oklahoma County.

On consideration of the paperwork laid before it, the court denies the relief sought. Art. 7, § 10(b), Okl. Const.; 20 O.S.1981 § 23, subdiv. (2); Rule 2, Rules on Administration of Courts, 20 O.S. 1981, Ch. 1, App. 2; Graham v. Cannon, Okl., 574 P.2d 305, 309 [1978],

OPALA, C.J., HODGES, Y.C.J., and SIMMS, HARGRAVE and ALMA WILSON, JJ., concur. KAUGER and SUMMERS, JJ., concur in result. LAVENDER and DOOLIN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monnet v. Freeman, 1991 OK 90, 821 P.2d 1061, 1991 Okla. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 287293 (Okla. 1991).

1991 OK 90 (Monnet v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. Cannon
1978 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1978)