Monnell v. Weller

2 Johns. 8
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The returns to the certioraris, in these causes, show that the plaintiff below was nonsuited at the trial, but that no costs have been adjudged against him. The nonsuits were improperly granted, but this court cannot restore the party to the state he was in, when the non-suit took place; and thus it turns out, that the only object in prosecuting these certioraris, is to throw a bill of costs on the defendant. We think the judgment below incomplete, and incapable of reversal or affirmance, and therefore give no judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monnell v. Weller, 2 Johns. 8 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

2 Johns. 8 (Monnell v. Weller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blum v. Hartman
3 Daly 47 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)
Beemis v. Wylie
19 Wis. 318 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1865)
Haulenbeck v. Gillies
7 Abb. Pr. 421 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)
Nellis v. Tucker
5 Denio 82 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)