Monk v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Monk v. State

244 S.W.3d 229, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2008 WL 222509

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2008

DocketED 89461

StatusPublished

This text of 244 S.W.3d 229 (Monk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monk v. State, 244 S.W.3d 229, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2008 WL 222509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Nelson R. Monk, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Nelson R. Monk, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.W.3d 229, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 158, 2008 WL 222509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monk-v-state-moctapp-2008.