Monk v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Monk v. State

737 S.W.2d 459, 293 Ark. 314

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 12, 1987·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Michael Monk, by his attorney, Marc Aaron Kline, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Monk will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then, the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Michael Monk, by his attorney, Marc Aaron Kline, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Monk will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then, the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Monk v. State, 737 S.W.2d 459, 293 Ark. 314 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

737 S.W.2d 459 (Monk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.