Monk v. . Satterfield
This text of 182 S.E. 108 (Monk v. . Satterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that an agent of the defendants purchased tobacco from the plaintiffs for the defendants, that said tobacco was delivered by the plaintiffs to said agent, and by said agent delivered to the defendants, and that the *848 defendants have failed and refused to pay tie purchase price of said tobacco, to wit: Tie sum of $436.05, was submitted to tie jury, under a charge which is free from error. The testimony of the agent that he was authorized by the defendants to purchase tobacco from the plaintiffs was corroborated by other evidence at the trial.
We find no error in the trial. The judgment is in accord with the verdict, and is affirmed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 S.E. 108, 208 N.C. 847, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monk-v-satterfield-nc-1935.