Monk v. Jackson
This text of 102 S.E. 382 (Monk v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The petition in trover, when legally construed, and as admitted by counsel for the plaintiff in error, was brought by the plaintiff in his own name, and yet it showed the title to the property sued for in another person, and failed to show any right of possession in the plaintiff. The petition was therefore fatally defective, and the court did not err in dismissing it on an oral motion by the defendant.
2. Although the bill of exceptions shows that before the motion to dismiss was made, the plaintiff introduced testimony tending to show a right of possession in him, and, further, that he had a special property right in the property sued for, the bill of exceptions and the record clearly show that no nonsuit was granted, but that the motion to dismiss the petition was made “ on account of fatal defects therein,” and that this motion was granted and the petition dismissed. It follows that this court can not consider the evidence introduced.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 25, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monk-v-jackson-gactapp-1920.