Monk v. Jackson

102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 25, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 569
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1920·No. 11112·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The petition in trover, when legally construed, and as admitted by counsel for the plaintiff in error, was brought by the plaintiff in his own name, and yet it showed the title to the property sued for in another person, and failed to show any right of possession in the plaintiff. The petition was therefore fatally defective, and the court did not err in dismissing it on an oral motion by the defendant.

2. Although the bill of exceptions shows that before the motion to dismiss was made, the plaintiff introduced testimony tending to show a right of possession in him, and, further, that he had a special property right in the property sued for, the bill of exceptions and the record clearly show that no nonsuit was granted, but that the motion to dismiss the petition was made “ on account of fatal defects therein,” and that this motion was granted and the petition dismissed. It follows that this court can not consider the evidence introduced.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Trover; from city court of Tifton—Judge Price. November 13, 1919. Ridgdill & Mitchell, for plaintiff. Fulwood & Hargrett, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monk v. Jackson, 102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 25, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 382 (Monk v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchie
166 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Dunlap-Huckabee Auto Co. v. Central Georgia Automotive Co.
122 S.E. 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)