Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 2024·No. 01-23-00931-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

her appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.

Appellant also failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We notified Appellant that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed Appellant to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by April 4, 2024, reflecting she paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date, Appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark (Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.