Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2024
Docket01-23-00931-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark (Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00931-CV ——————————— MONIQUE VENITA MCKNIGHT, Appellant V. SEDRIC COPPOCK CLARK, Appellee

On Appeal from 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-16300

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Monique Venita McKnight filed her notice of appeal on December

13, 2023. Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for

purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. The Clerk of this Court

notified Appellant that unless she paid the appellate filing fee by February 5, 2024, her appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellant has

not paid the appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate

costs.

Appellant also failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We

notified Appellant that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the

clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed Appellant

to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by April 4, 2024, reflecting she

paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date,

Appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s record has not

been filed.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Monique Venita McKnight v. Sedric Coppock Clark, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monique-venita-mcknight-v-sedric-coppock-clark-texapp-2024.