Monique Parker v. Zachary Bryan Parker

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2009
Docket14-08-01132-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Monique Parker v. Zachary Bryan Parker (Monique Parker v. Zachary Bryan Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monique Parker v. Zachary Bryan Parker, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2009

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-01132-CV

MONIQUE PARKER, Appellant

V.

ZACHARY BRYAN PARKER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-43468

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

According to information provided to this Court, this is an appeal from an order signed November 17, 2008.  No clerk=s record has been filed.  The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 


In addition, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent);Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2009) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

On January 26, 2009, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  In addition, on January 15, 2009, appellant was notified that the appeal was subject to dismissal for nonpayment of the filing fee.  Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Monique Parker v. Zachary Bryan Parker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monique-parker-v-zachary-bryan-parker-texapp-2009.