Moniotte v. Bouanchaud

71 So. 735, 139 La. 445, 1916 La. LEXIS 1565
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 24, 1916·No. No. 21871·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

An appeal having been taken from a judgment dissolving an injunction, and it having been perfected by the giving of bond, a rule was taken in the trial court to show cause why the surety on the appeal bond should not be declared to be insufficient. Judgment was rendered on this rule declaring the surety to be insufficient, and the matter now to be considered is an appeal from the latter judgment.

Appellee calls attention to the fact that the transcript of the first, or main, appeal has never been filed in this court, and that the time for doing so has long ago expired, so that the appeal has lapsed, and that, this being so, the present appeal, which’ is but in aid of the other, presents but a moot ease, and should therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moniotte v. Bouanchaud, 71 So. 735, 139 La. 445, 1916 La. LEXIS 1565 (La. 1916).

71 So. 735 (Moniotte v. Bouanchaud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pettingill v. Hills, Inc.
6 So. 2d 660 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Cropper v. City of Natchitoches
185 So. 308 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)
Kirby v. Kirby
146 So. 743 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Browne v. Levy
130 So. 633 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Straub v. Healy
114 So. 634 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Doullut v. Rush
77 So. 116 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1917)