Monile v. Balester

171 A.D.2d 1040, 579 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6769

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred by holding that plaintiff made out a prima facie showing of serious injury sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Defendant sustained his burden of proving that plaintiff did not suffer from a medically determined injury, and plaintiff’s subjective complaints of pain, unsupported by any competent medical evidence, are insufficient to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of the Insurance Law (see, McKnight v LaValle, 147 AD2d 902, 903, Iv denied 74 NY2d 605; Costa v Billingsley, 127 AD2d 990, 991; Doyle v Erie County Water Auth., 113 AD2d 1016). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monile v. Balester, 171 A.D.2d 1040, 579 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 1040 (Monile v. Balester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doyle v. Erie County Water Authority
113 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Costa v. Billingsley
127 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
McKnight v. La-Valle
147 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)