Monick v. City of New York
49 A.D.2d 768, 374 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10765
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1975·Published
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 3, 1975, affirmed, without costs. Under all of the circumstances in the record we cannot say that Special Term abused its discretion in granting respondent’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer to plaintiffs complaint setting up the fellow-servant rule as a defense. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monick v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 768, 374 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).
49 A.D.2d 768 (Monick v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.