Monica Zadik v. Guillermo L. Romero, III

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 2025
Docket01-24-01022-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Monica Zadik v. Guillermo L. Romero, III (Monica Zadik v. Guillermo L. Romero, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monica Zadik v. Guillermo L. Romero, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 29, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-01022-CV ——————————— MONICA ZADIK, Appellant V. GUILLERMO L. ROMERO, III, Appellee

On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-31033

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Monica Zadik, has filed her notice of appeal on December 27,

2024. Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for

purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that unless she paid the appellate filing fee by February 24, 2025,

her appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, appellant has

neither paid the appellate filing fee, nor established indigence for purposes of

appellate costs.

Appellant also failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We

notified appellant that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the

clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed appellant

to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by March 5, 2025, reflecting

she paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To

date, appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s record has

not been filed.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Monica Zadik v. Guillermo L. Romero, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monica-zadik-v-guillermo-l-romero-iii-texapp-2025.