Moniac Chemical Co. v. King & Clark

68 S.E. 1023, 135 Ga. 117, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 435
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

No errors are shown in any of the rulings of the court below, nor in the portions of the charge excepted to; and there w£s sufficient evidence to authorize the finding of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.' Wilson, Bennett & Lambdin and Toomer & Reynolds, for plaintiff in error. R. F. Dunwody and J. L. Sweat, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moniac Chemical Co. v. King & Clark, 68 S.E. 1023, 135 Ga. 117, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 435 (Ga. 1910).

68 S.E. 1023 (Moniac Chemical Co. v. King & Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Carvalho v. Warden of City Prison
144 A.D. 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)