Mongon v. Bank of New York Mellon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mongon v. Bank of New York Mellon

188 So. 3d 113, 2016 WL 1261004, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5031

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 2016·No. 5D15-761·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Phan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l. Tr. Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly D516, - So.3d -, 2016 WL 746400 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 26, 2016) (“[A] plaintiff may demonstrate by competent, substantial evidence its standing to foreclose a mortgage under section 637.0311, Florida Statutes, where it has constructive possession of a mortgage note through its agent at the time it files a complaint for foreclosure.”).

LAWSON, C.J., EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Phan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l. Tr. Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly D516, - So.3d -, 2016 WL 746400 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 26, 2016) (“[A] plaintiff may demonstrate by competent, substantial evidence its standing to foreclose a mortgage under section 637.0311, Florida Statutes, where it has constructive possession of a mortgage note through its agent at the time it files a complaint for foreclosure.”).

LAWSON, C.J., EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Mongon v. Bank of New York Mellon, 188 So. 3d 113, 2016 WL 1261004, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

188 So. 3d 113 (Mongon v. Bank of New York Mellon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related