Monge v. California
This text of 522 U.S. 1072 (Monge v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of California Public Defenders Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Does the Double Jeopardy Clause apply to non-capital sentencing proceedings that have the hallmarks of a trial on guilt or innocence?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 27, 1998. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 27,1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, [1073]*1073April 13,1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
522 U.S. 1072, 118 S. Ct. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monge-v-california-scotus-1998.