Mong v. State ex rel. Flora

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Mong v. State ex rel. Flora

10 G. & J. 380

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 15, 1839

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 G. & J. 380 (Mong v. State ex rel. Flora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mong v. State ex rel. Flora, 10 G. & J. 380 (Md. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

Chambers, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principles adopted by this court in the case of Eccleston vs. State, 7 Gill & John. 316, must govern this case.

The policy of the acts of assembly, in relation to this sub-jeet, are well effected by the practice which we believe is uni-' form, and by which the person providing for the illegitimate' child is regarded as standing in the place of the county, and' entitled to have a scire facias to reimburse himself for his ex- - penditures, within the amount limited by these acts.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principles adopted by this court in the case of Eccleston vs. State, 7 Gill & John. 316, must govern this case.

The policy of the acts of assembly, in relation to this sub-jeet, are well effected by the practice which we believe is uni-' form, and by which the person providing for the illegitimate' child is regarded as standing in the place of the county, and' entitled to have a scire facias to reimburse himself for his ex- - penditures, within the amount limited by these acts.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 G. & J. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mong-v-state-ex-rel-flora-md-1839.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack