Monforte v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Monforte v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

16 A.D.2d 833, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9461

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 833 (Monforte v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monforte v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 16 A.D.2d 833, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged fraud and deceit, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 21, 1901, which granted his motion for reargument and, on such reargument, adhered to the original decision. Such decision (1) denied plaintiff’s motion to examine certain of the defendants before trial and to extend plaintiff’s time to serve a bill of particulars until after such examination; and (2) granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, dismissed the amended complaint and directed judgment in favor of the defendants. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged fraud and deceit, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 21, 1901, which granted his motion for reargument and, on such reargument, adhered to the original decision. Such decision (1) denied plaintiff’s motion to examine certain of the defendants before trial and to extend plaintiff’s time to serve a bill of particulars until after such examination; and (2) granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, dismissed the amended complaint and directed judgment in favor of the defendants. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 833, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monforte-v-chemical-bank-new-york-trust-co-nyappdiv-1962.