Moneypenny v. Caselinuovo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moneypenny v. Caselinuovo

18 A.D.2d 959, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 959 (Moneypenny v. Caselinuovo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moneypenny v. Caselinuovo, 18 A.D.2d 959, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within 10 days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $35,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal .to any party. Memorandum: We find that the verdict is excessive and that a fair award to the plaintiff would have been $35,000. (Appeal by defendants from judgment and order of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and MeClusky, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within 10 days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $35,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal .to any party. Memorandum: We find that the verdict is excessive and that a fair award to the plaintiff would have been $35,000. (Appeal by defendants from judgment and order of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and MeClusky, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 959, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moneypenny-v-caselinuovo-nyappdiv-1963.