Monestime v. State

88 So. 3d 204, 2011 WL 4578316, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 5, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-800
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 So. 3d 204 (Monestime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monestime v. State, 88 So. 3d 204, 2011 WL 4578316, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Welch Monestime appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court based its ruling on a credibility determination in favor of trial counsel. This Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on issues of credibility as long as the trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. See Gore v. State, 846 So.2d 461, 468 (Fla.2003). Because the trial court’s findings here were supported by trial counsel’s testimony, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 204, 2011 WL 4578316, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monestime-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.