Monds v. State
756 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 2000 WL 525940
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2000·No. No. 4D00-0284·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court denied the facially sufficient motion ■without attaching portions of the record to conclusively refute appellant’s claims, we reverse and remand for such attachments or for an evidentiary hearing on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monds v. State, 756 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 2000 WL 525940 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
756 So. 2d 1093 (Monds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seta Corp. of Boca, Inc. v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN.
756 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)