Monds v. State
756 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 2000 WL 525940
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-0284
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 756 So. 2d 1093 (Monds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Monds v. State, 756 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 2000 WL 525940 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary denial of a Rule 3.850 motion. Because the trial court denied the facially sufficient motion ■without attaching portions of the record to conclusively refute appellant’s claims, we reverse and remand for such attachments or for an evidentiary hearing on the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seta Corp. of Boca, Inc. v. OFFICE OF ATTY. GEN.
756 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
756 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 2000 WL 525940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monds-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.