Mondragon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mondragon v. State

134 S.W.2d 268, 138 Tex. Crim. 142, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 25, 1939

DocketNo. 20686.

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W.2d 268 (Mondragon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mondragon v. State, 134 S.W.2d 268, 138 Tex. Crim. 142, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of marihuana; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of marihuana; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.W.2d 268, 138 Tex. Crim. 142, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mondragon-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.