Mondano v. Mondano
122 N.Y.S. 731
Opinion
The complaint alleges that the defendant committed adultery “with a certain male person, Achille De Archangelo by name.” The testimony, however, does not disclose the identity of the man with whom the offense proved was committed. The proof is therefore insufficient. Bokel v. Bokel, 3 Edw. Ch. 376 ; see Wood v. Wood, 2 Paige, 113; Mitchell v. Mitchell, 61 N. Y. 398.
If the plaintiff wishes to introduce further proof, he may do so at Trial Term, Part 12, on April 19, 1910, at 10:30 a. m.; otherwise, the complaint will be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mondano v. Mondano, 122 N.Y.S. 731 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).
122 N.Y.S. 731 (Mondano v. Mondano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. . Mitchell
61 N.Y. 398 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Wood v. Wood
2 Paige Ch. 108 (New York Court of Chancery, 1830)
Bokel v. Bokel
3 Edw. Ch. 376 (New York Court of Chancery, 1840)