Mondaine v. State
This text of 233 S.W.3d 768 (Mondaine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Orlando Mondaine, appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 S.W.3d 768, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298, 2007 WL 2769447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mondaine-v-state-moctapp-2007.