Moncrief v. State

137 S.E. 863, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 219
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket17916
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 863 (Moncrief v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moncrief v. State, 137 S.E. 863, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds and grounds merely elaborating those grounds. “The evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to infer that the criminal act of violence set out in the indictment was committed by the accused in pursuance of a common intent; and, in the absence of complaint of any error of law, the conviction for riot must be sustained.” Grier v. State, 11 Ga. App. 767 (2) (76 S. E. 70). The principle announced in the foregoing ruling is controlling in this case. See also Walker v. State, 17 Ga. App. 525 (87 S. E. 711); Lewis v. State, 2 Ga. App. 659 (58 S. E. 1070); Jemley v. State, 121 Ga. 346 (49 S. E. 292).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., eonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jemley v. State
49 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Lewis v. State
58 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Grier v. State
76 S.E. 70 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Walker v. State
87 S.E. 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 863, 36 Ga. App. 654, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moncrief-v-state-gactapp-1927.