Moncrief v. Russell Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Moncrief v. Russell Corp.

627 So. 2d 389, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 319, 1993 WL 236315

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moncrief v. Russell Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 253 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 2, 1993·No. 2910061·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 627 So.2d 385. On remand to this court, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. This case is remanded with instructions for the trial court to enter a judgment for temporary total disability benefits in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of May 14, 1993.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THIGPEN and YATES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part and reversed in part and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. 627 So.2d 385. On remand to this court, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. This case is remanded with instructions for the trial court to enter a judgment for temporary total disability benefits in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of May 14, 1993.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THIGPEN and YATES, JJ., concur.

Moncrief v. Russell Corp., 627 So. 2d 389, 1993 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 319, 1993 WL 236315 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

627 So. 2d 389 (Moncrief v. Russell Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.