Moncrief v. Rosenthal
49 A.D.3d 511, 851 N.Y.2d 892
Opinion
The defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Appell v Mandel, 296 AD2d 514 [2002]; Singh v Persaud, 269 AD2d 381, 382 [2000]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moncrief v. Rosenthal, 49 A.D.3d 511, 851 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 511 (Moncrief v. Rosenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singh v. Persaud
269 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Appell v. Mandel
296 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)