Monclova v. Colon

Second Circuit

Monclova v. Colon

94 F. App'x 867

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7681

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F. App'x 867 (Monclova v. Colon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monclova v. Colon, 94 F. App'x 867 (2d Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Celestino P. Monclova, pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his employment discrimination complaint against Joseph Colon and Wackenhut Corrections Corporation.

Upon full consideration of plaintiff-appellant’s argument, we find no error that would lead us to reverse the district court. We note that none of the state claims were dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, which is modified to state that all of the state claims are dismissed without prejudice, is AFFIRMED, as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Celestino P. Monclova, pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his employment discrimination complaint against Joseph Colon and Wackenhut Corrections Corporation.

Upon full consideration of plaintiff-appellant’s argument, we find no error that would lead us to reverse the district court. We note that none of the state claims were dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, which is modified to state that all of the state claims are dismissed without prejudice, is AFFIRMED, as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F. App'x 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monclova-v-colon-ca2-2004.