Monckton v. State
241 S.W. 1019, 92 Tex. Crim. 235, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 407
Opinions
— Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court of Dallas County of the offense of forgery, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.
The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. We have examined the indictment and the charge of the court and each appears to be in due and regular form. No error appearing in this case, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monckton v. State, 241 S.W. 1019, 92 Tex. Crim. 235, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 407 (Tex. 1922).
241 S.W. 1019 (Monckton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morales v. State
427 S.W.2d 51 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Ex Parte Hodges
314 S.W.2d 581 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Williams v. State
244 S.W. 1023 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Sisson v. State
244 S.W. 1012 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)