Monarch Real Estate Co. v. Frye

133 N.E. 156, 77 Ind. App. 119, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 4
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1922
DocketNo. 10,891
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 133 N.E. 156 (Monarch Real Estate Co. v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monarch Real Estate Co. v. Frye, 133 N.E. 156, 77 Ind. App. 119, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 4 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

Action by appellant against appellees to enjoin them from closing and interfering with an alleyway alleged to be appurtenant to appellant’s real estate in-the city of Elkhart, Indiana, and to establish an easement in such alleyway.

There was a special finding of facts, which facts so far as here involved, are in substance as follows:

Cyrus E. Frye, hereinafter mentioned as appellee, and his immediate and remote predecessors in title, for more than fifty years last past, have been the owners in fee simple of a part of Lot No. 54 of the First Addition to the town (now city) of Elkhart, Indiana, described as follows: Beginning on the east line of Main street, twenty-two and one-half feet south of the northwest corner of said lot; thence east eighty feet; thence north twenty-two and one-half feet; thence east five feet; thence south eighty-two and one-half feet; thence west five feet; thence north twenty feet; thence west to Main street, thence north to beginning. There has been for more than forty years last past on said real estate a three-story brick building facing Main street on the west, and extending sixty-five feet easterly. Appellant is the owner of the following: a part of said Lot 54: beginning at the southwestern corner of said lot, and running thence eastwardly eighty feet; thence northwardly twenty feet; thence westwardly eighty feet to the west line of said lot; thence southwardly twenty feet to the beginning.

The following plat will help to understand the situation :

[121]*121 yZ06IrMfCEBRjEmPqR56CBtCHE1B5

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patricia M. Jones v. Von Hollow Association, Inc.
103 N.E.3d 667 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2018)
O'DELL v. Stegall
703 S.E.2d 561 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2010)
Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.
838 N.E.2d 403 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2005)
Downing v. Owens
809 N.E.2d 444 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Ballard v. Harman
737 N.E.2d 411 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Carnahan v. Moriah Property Owners Ass'n
716 N.E.2d 437 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Naderman v. Smith
512 N.E.2d 425 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1987)
Bulatovich v. Easton
435 N.E.2d 997 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
Searcy v. La Grotte
372 N.E.2d 755 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1978)
Brown v. Heidersbach
360 N.E.2d 614 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1977)
Pugh v. Conway
299 N.E.2d 214 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1973)
Hutchinson v. WORLEY
154 N.E.2d 389 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1958)
Simmons v. Perkins
118 P.2d 740 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1941)
Wiard v. Landes
141 N.E. 519 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.E. 156, 77 Ind. App. 119, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monarch-real-estate-co-v-frye-indctapp-1922.