Monarch Mining Co. v. Laughlin
146 N.Y.S. 1068
Opinion
This action was brought against a surety on an undertaking on appeal from the Municipal Court to this court. As the complaint does not allege compliance with section 1309 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the judgment on the pleadings should have been for the defendant, instead of the plaintiff.
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monarch Mining Co. v. Laughlin, 146 N.Y.S. 1068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
146 N.Y.S. 1068 (Monarch Mining Co. v. Laughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wasserman v. Maslon
140 Misc. 847 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
North Side Hoisting Co. v. Southern Surety Co.
94 Misc. 167 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)