Monarch Life Insurance v. Perlroth

Connecticut Superior Court

Monarch Life Insurance v. Perlroth

3 Conn. Supp. 192, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 166

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedDecember 16, 1935

DocketFile #46942

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Conn. Supp. 192 (Monarch Life Insurance v. Perlroth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monarch Life Insurance v. Perlroth, 3 Conn. Supp. 192, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 166 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

CORNELL, J.

Plaintiff asks that “defendant be ordered to produce for its inspection .... the New Haven Hospital Record of Carl A. Perlroth, deceased.....”

It appears from the argument of plaintiff’s counsel that the motion is made under the authority of Practice Book, #76.

It is not stated in the motion that the record referred to is in the possession of the defendant and it appears to be admitted in argument that it is not.

While the motion does not disclose the fact counsel states that the record in question is at the New Haven Hospital and that that institution will not or may not permit plaintiff to inspect it without the sanction of the defendant.

While this may be true, it does not follow that if the present defendant were to give permission to the New Haven Hospital to show the record in question to plaintiff, the latter institution would be bound to do so.

It cannot be said under such circumstances that the record is in defendant’s “power” to produce.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI