Monahan v. Monahan, No. Fa77 0033418 S (Nov. 23, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Monahan v. Monahan, No. Fa77 0033418 S (Nov. 23, 1990)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4100

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 23, 1990·No. No. FA77 0033418 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S PETITION REGARDING APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE FAMILY MAGISTRATE (#167) By memorandum dated June 9, 1990, the Family Support Magistrate, Miller, issued a decision in the above captioned matter. The memorandum dealt with the plaintiff's motion to modify alimony and support, dated February 22, 1990 and considered the question of arrearages. It did not address the other motions filed by the parties and on which testimony was taken.

Pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes 46b-231(n), 7, the above captioned matter is remanded to the Family Support Magistrate for further proceedings.

Specifically, the hearing magistrate is to take additional testimony on the following listed motions presented before him, or if no additional testimony is required the magistrate shall articulated his decisions on all the motions presented and his CT Page 4101 findings and conclusions reached in reference to his decisions.

The motions presented before the trial magistrate and requiring a decision are as follows:

Plaintiff's Motion for Modification dated June 19, 1989;

Defendant's Motion for Modification dated July 7, 1989;

Defendant's Motion for Contempt dated July 7, 1989.

The court requests the Family Support Magistrate to comply with this remand within 60 days.

So ordered.

NOVACK, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S PETITION REGARDING APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE FAMILY MAGISTRATE (#167) By memorandum dated June 9, 1990, the Family Support Magistrate, Miller, issued a decision in the above captioned matter. The memorandum dealt with the plaintiff's motion to modify alimony and support, dated February 22, 1990 and considered the question of arrearages. It did not address the other motions filed by the parties and on which testimony was taken.

Pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes 46b-231(n), 7, the above captioned matter is remanded to the Family Support Magistrate for further proceedings.

Specifically, the hearing magistrate is to take additional testimony on the following listed motions presented before him, or if no additional testimony is required the magistrate shall articulated his decisions on all the motions presented and his CT Page 4101 findings and conclusions reached in reference to his decisions.

The motions presented before the trial magistrate and requiring a decision are as follows:

Plaintiff's Motion for Modification dated June 19, 1989;

Defendant's Motion for Modification dated July 7, 1989;

Defendant's Motion for Contempt dated July 7, 1989.

The court requests the Family Support Magistrate to comply with this remand within 60 days.

So ordered.

NOVACK, J.

Monahan v. Monahan, No. Fa77 0033418 S (Nov. 23, 1990), 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4100 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4100 (Monahan v. Monahan, No. Fa77 0033418 S (Nov. 23, 1990)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.