Monahan v. Homeowner's of La Cita, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Monahan v. Homeowner's of La Cita, Inc.

622 So. 2d 551, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932, 1993 WL 284671

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 30, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2901

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 551 (Monahan v. Homeowner's of La Cita, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monahan v. Homeowner's of La Cita, Inc., 622 So. 2d 551, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932, 1993 WL 284671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

Because of its limited holding, we affirm the summary judgment entered in this cause. The appellants were merely “enjoined” from the parking of their motor home within the La Cita subdivision except in strict compliance with the applicable deed restrictions for the subdivision.

We agree with the trial court that the record demonstrates that a motor home is covered by the restrictions and may not be “stored” at the residence. The issue not yet resolved by the trial court, but will be upon an application for enforcement of the injunction, is what constitutes “storing.” That issue is not properly before us at the this time.

AFFIRMED.

DIAMANTIS, J., and STROKER, R.J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Chief Judge.

Because of its limited holding, we affirm the summary judgment entered in this cause. The appellants were merely “enjoined” from the parking of their motor home within the La Cita subdivision except in strict compliance with the applicable deed restrictions for the subdivision.

We agree with the trial court that the record demonstrates that a motor home is covered by the restrictions and may not be “stored” at the residence. The issue not yet resolved by the trial court, but will be upon an application for enforcement of the injunction, is what constitutes “storing.” That issue is not properly before us at the this time.

AFFIRMED.

DIAMANTIS, J., and STROKER, R.J., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 551, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932, 1993 WL 284671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monahan-v-homeowners-of-la-cita-inc-fladistctapp-1993.