Monaco v. Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Monaco v. Raymond

112 A.D.2d 995, 492 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52205

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 12, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 995 (Monaco v. Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monaco v. Raymond, 112 A.D.2d 995, 492 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to remove certain material from petitioner’s personnel file, the appeals are from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), entered January 10, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding on the merits, and (2) an order of the same court (Marbach, J.), entered June 6, 1984, which denied petitioner’s motion for leave to renew.

Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the argument of these appeals, the respondent determined to "rescind the * * * letter in question” and stated that the letter "will not be included in [petitioner’s] personnel folder”. Accordingly, the issues raised in this proceeding to compel respondent to remove the letter have been rendered moot. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur. [122 Misc 2d 370.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to remove certain material from petitioner’s personnel file, the appeals are from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ferraro, J.), entered January 10, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding on the merits, and (2) an order of the same court (Marbach, J.), entered June 6, 1984, which denied petitioner’s motion for leave to renew.

Appeals dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Subsequent to the argument of these appeals, the respondent determined to "rescind the * * * letter in question” and stated that the letter "will not be included in [petitioner’s] personnel folder”. Accordingly, the issues raised in this proceeding to compel respondent to remove the letter have been rendered moot. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur. [122 Misc 2d 370.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 995, 492 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monaco-v-raymond-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack