Monaco v. Camie-Campbell, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Monaco v. Camie-Campbell, Inc.

93 N.Y.2d 887

DecidedApril 6, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 93 N.Y.2d 887 (Monaco v. Camie-Campbell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monaco v. Camie-Campbell, Inc., 93 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that precluded appellants from using the testimony of certain witnesses at trial and denied appellants’ motion to compel acceptance of expert disclosure, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that precluded appellants from using the testimony of certain witnesses at trial and denied appellants’ motion to compel acceptance of expert disclosure, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 N.Y.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monaco-v-camie-campbell-inc-ny-1999.