Monachelli v. Administrator, No. Cv98 006448s (Nov. 18, 1999)
This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 15333 (Monachelli v. Administrator, No. Cv98 006448s (Nov. 18, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The history related by plaintiff does portray a less than ideal set of circumstances in which plaintiff was required to work. However, at each level, recourse was denied.
At oral argument, the court sought to elicit from appellant reasons why the conclusions below were unworthy of affirmance. Plaintiff clearly appeared able only to articulate the essentially basic facts submitted on each preceding occasion.
Explanations were offered as to the limited nature of the court's review. See, Latina v. Administrator,
As a result, plaintiff's appeal must be denied.
The Court
Thomas L. Nadeau, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 15333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monachelli-v-administrator-no-cv98-006448s-nov-18-1999-connsuperct-1999.