Monacelli v. Armstrong
406 N.E.2d 804, 49 N.Y.2d 971, 428 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2321
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Reid S. Moule insofar as that opinion relates to the defendants Van Gelder and the Chili Fire Department.
As there was no showing of negligence, proximate cause, or foreseeability, summary judgment was properly granted to these defendants.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
[973] Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monacelli v. Armstrong, 406 N.E.2d 804, 49 N.Y.2d 971, 428 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2321 (N.Y. 1980).
406 N.E.2d 804 (Monacelli v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphy v. Both
84 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Amica Mutual Insurance v. Town of Vestal
191 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)