Home/New York Court of Appeals/Monacelli v. Armstrong

Monacelli v. Armstrong

406 N.E.2d 804, 49 N.Y.2d 971, 428 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2321
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 406 N.E.2d 804 (Monacelli v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monacelli v. Armstrong, 406 N.E.2d 804, 49 N.Y.2d 971, 428 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2321 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Reid S. Moule insofar as that opinion relates to the defendants Van Gelder and the Chili Fire Department.

As there was no showing of negligence, proximate cause, or foreseeability, summary judgment was properly granted to these defendants.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

[973]*973Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Both
84 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Amica Mutual Insurance v. Town of Vestal
191 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 N.E.2d 804, 49 N.Y.2d 971, 428 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monacelli-v-armstrong-ny-1980.