Mona, Jr. v. CV Sciences, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 16, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-02196
StatusUnknown

This text of Mona, Jr. v. CV Sciences, Inc. (Mona, Jr. v. CV Sciences, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mona, Jr. v. CV Sciences, Inc., (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MICHAEL J. MONA, JR., Case No.: 2:21-cv-02196-APG-DJA

4 Plaintiff Order to Supplement Briefing

5 v.

6 CV SCIENCES, INC.,

7 Defendant

8 Defendant CV Sciences, Inc. moves to dismiss plaintiff Michael J. Mona’s complaint. 9 CV Sciences argues that Mona’s claims are barred because they are compulsory counterclaims 10 that Mona should have asserted in a prior California state court action that CV Sciences brought 11 against Mona. That action is stayed while the parties pursue arbitration. Mona argues that he 12 can bring his claims in a separate federal case because they do not arise out of the same factual 13 transaction or occurrence as the California case. Because neither party has sufficiently briefed 14 the applicable law, I order each party to file a supplemental brief. 15 To determine whether a counterclaim was compulsory in a state court case, I look to the 16 law of the state in which the state case was filed. Pochiro v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 827 F.2d 17 1246, 1249 (9th Cir. 1987); Fox v. Maulding, 112 F.3d 453, 456-57 (10th Cir. 1997); Vashisht- 18 Rota v. Howell Mgmt. Services, 837 Fed. Appx. 602, 602 (9th Cir. 2021). Here, California law 19 applies. Under California law, if a defendant fails to assert a compulsory counterclaim against 20 the plaintiff at the time the answer is served, that counterclaim is waived. Cal. Code of Civil 21 Procedure § 426.30(a). However, a defendant who fails to raise a compulsory counterclaim does 22 not waive that claim if he never filed an answer in the action. Id. § 426.30(b)(2). 23 ] Neither party addressed this law or indicated whether Mona filed an answer in the state court case. Consequently, I direct the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing this issue. 3 I THEREFORE ORDER that by September 2, 2022, each of the parties shall file a supplemental brief of no more than five pages to address whether the counterclaims were compulsory under California law. 6 DATED this 16th day of August, 2022. 7 8 ANDREW P.GORDON sits 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mona, Jr. v. CV Sciences, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mona-jr-v-cv-sciences-inc-nvd-2022.