Momoi Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 420
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 12, 1961
DocketNo. 65448; protests 59/29219, etc. (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 420 (Momoi Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Momoi Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 420 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

[421]*421Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified, for cotton fishing nets, by similitude. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of synthetic cord or twine similar in all material respects to the component material of the fish nets involved in said Abstract 63947, were held dutiable, depending upon the date of entry, at 33, 31%, or 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 912, as modified, for synthetic cord or twine, similar to cotton cords.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/momoi-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.