Moment v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Moment v. Maryland

333 F. App'x 767

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2009

DocketNo. 09-1139

StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 767 (Moment v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moment v. Maryland, 333 F. App'x 767 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

[768]*768Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-00086-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 22, 2009; Jan. 29, 2009). Moment’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[768]*768Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-00086-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 22, 2009; Jan. 29, 2009). Moment’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 F. App'x 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moment-v-maryland-ca4-2009.