Mombeleur v. Salazar

257 A.D.2d 612, 683 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 341

This text of 257 A.D.2d 612 (Mombeleur v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mombeleur v. Salazar, 257 A.D.2d 612, 683 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated July 17, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the failure of the plaintiff Gelina Mombeleur to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record presents a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the plaintiff Gelina Mombeleur sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3212
New York CVP § 3212
§ 5102
New York ISC § 5102(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D.2d 612, 683 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mombeleur-v-salazar-nyappdiv-1999.