Momah v. Rogers
711 N.E.2d 198, 93 N.Y.2d 864, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1348
This text of 711 N.E.2d 198 (Momah v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Momah v. Rogers, 711 N.E.2d 198, 93 N.Y.2d 864, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1348 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (239 AD2d 20).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Momah v. Rogers
239 A.D.2d 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.E.2d 198, 93 N.Y.2d 864, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/momah-v-rogers-ny-1999.