Momah v. Rogers
711 N.E.2d 198, 93 N.Y.2d 864, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1348
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (239 AD2d 20).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Momah v. Rogers, 711 N.E.2d 198, 93 N.Y.2d 864, 689 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1348 (N.Y. 1999).
711 N.E.2d 198 (Momah v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Momah v. Rogers
239 A.D.2d 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)