Molyneux v. Mondrow
This text of 5 A.D.3d 446 (Molyneux v. Mondrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Jean-Claude Jean appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated June 23, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion which was to dismiss the supplemental summons and the amended complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
[447]*447Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiff timely complied with the provision of a prior order of the Supreme Court granting her motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint (see CPLR 1003). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 446, 772 N.Y.S.2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molyneux-v-mondrow-nyappdiv-2004.