Moltotal v. Holder

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2009
Docket08-1869
StatusUnpublished

This text of Moltotal v. Holder (Moltotal v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moltotal v. Holder, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1869

SAMUEL ADINEW MOLTOTAL,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 3, 2009 Decided: June 18, 2009

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Gerald M. Alexander, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Adinew Moltotal, a native and citizen of

Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We

have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse

of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). We therefore

deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. See In re: Moltotal (B.I.A. July 9, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Moltotal v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moltotal-v-holder-ca4-2009.