Molte v. Barbaresi
This text of 242 A.D. 666 (Molte v. Barbaresi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified by striking therefrom the portion thereof which grants defendant leave to serve an amended answer, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. In our opinion, the Special Term improperly exercised its discretion in granting defendant leave to serve an amended answer, in view of the gross laches disclosed by the record, which is entirely unexcused. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molte-v-barbaresi-nyappdiv-1934.