Molsen v. Young

Supreme Court

Molsen v. Young

340 U.S. 880, 71 S. Ct. 195, 95 L. Ed. 639, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1412

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 13, 1950

DocketNo. 292

StatusPublished

This text of 340 U.S. 880 (Molsen v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Molsen v. Young, 340 U.S. 880, 71 S. Ct. 195, 95 L. Ed. 639, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1412 (1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The joint motion of petitioner and the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court are vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the effect of § 25 of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1013, with leave to each party to present further evidence upon the material issues of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The joint motion of petitioner and the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court are vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the effect of § 25 of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1013, with leave to each party to present further evidence upon the material issues of the case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 U.S. 880, 71 S. Ct. 195, 95 L. Ed. 639, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molsen-v-young-scotus-1950.