Moloney v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moloney v. Schwartz

188 A.D. 901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D. 901 (Moloney v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moloney v. Schwartz, 188 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision “ that the cause maintain its position on the trial calendar for the February Term, 1919,” on the ground that it was beyond the court’s power and imposed a penalty upon the defendant for a favor granted to the plaintiff (Bertman v. Neisner, 177 App. Div. 442, 443), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out the provision “ that the cause maintain its position on the trial calendar for the February Term, 1919,” on the ground that it was beyond the court’s power and imposed a penalty upon the defendant for a favor granted to the plaintiff (Bertman v. Neisner, 177 App. Div. 442, 443), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moloney-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack