Moloney v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moloney v. Schwartz

188 A.D. 901

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1919·Published

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision “ that the cause maintain its position on the trial calendar for the February Term, 1919,” on the ground that it was beyond the court’s power and imposed a penalty upon the defendant for a favor granted to the plaintiff (Bertman v. Neisner, 177 App. Div. 442, 443), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out the provision “ that the cause maintain its position on the trial calendar for the February Term, 1919,” on the ground that it was beyond the court’s power and imposed a penalty upon the defendant for a favor granted to the plaintiff (Bertman v. Neisner, 177 App. Div. 442, 443), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.-

Moloney v. Schwartz, 188 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

188 A.D. 901 (Moloney v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related