Molly Ortiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2019·No. 05-18-00081-CR·Published

Opinion

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed March 27, 2019

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00081-CR

MOLLY ORTIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-30318-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Myers, and Justice Pedersen, III Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant Molly Ortiz waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to possession of

methamphetamine in an amount less than one gram. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court

deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on three years’ community supervision, and assessed

a $1,500 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect,

there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim.

App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel

delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se

response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by

counsel).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 180081F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MOLLY ORTIZ, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-00081-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F16-30318-I. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Pedersen, III participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered March 27, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Molly Ortiz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Molly Ortiz v. State (Molly Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)