Molloy v. Whitmer

519 S.W.2d 825
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 21, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 519 S.W.2d 825 (Molloy v. Whitmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Molloy v. Whitmer, 519 S.W.2d 825 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

RCA 3.150 provides that nothing connected with a disciplinary case shall be made public unless ordered by the Court. In this case a Commonwealth’s Attorney seeks an order of mandamus requiring the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association to deliver up records relating to a disciplinary proceeding pending against a member of the bar in order that he may determine whether violations of the criminal law have taken place.

It is essential that the records of a disciplinary proceeding conducted by the bar association with respect to one of its members be privileged against intrusion. Prosecuting authorities must exercise their own investigative resources without invading the confidentiality of the association’s disciplinary files.

Mandamus is denied.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 S.W.2d 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molloy-v-whitmer-kyctapp-1975.