Molloy v. Froyton
This text of 124 Misc. 2d 865 (Molloy v. Froyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Appeal dismissed.
No appeal lies from a judgment entered pursuant to an award by an arbitrator in a small claims proceeding (see Brownstein v County of Westchester, Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation, 51 AD2d 792; Heller v Sable, 39 Misc 2d 343; Trager v Abalene Blouse & Sportswear Corp., 1 Misc 2d 952). Defendant’s remedy, if he be so advised, is to move to set aside the judgment (see, generally, 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5015.12). Upon the determination of such a motion, the aggrieved party may, if he be so advised, appeal to this court.
Slifkin, J. P., Geiler and Widlitz, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 Misc. 2d 865, 479 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molloy-v-froyton-nyappterm-1984.